# \#kriging

**URL:** https://openturns.discourse.group/tag/kriging/1.md

[Latest](https://openturns.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://openturns.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://openturns.discourse.group/tags.md)

---

## [Define and optimize the kriging mean term as a deterministic function dependent on space.](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/define-and-optimize-the-kriging-mean-term-as-a-deterministic-function-dependent-on-space/425)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Clement](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/Clement)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [September 30, 2025, 7:16pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/define-and-optimize-the-kriging-mean-term-as-a-deterministic-function-dependent-on-space/425 "2025-09-30T19:16:52Z")

</div>

Hello, I am currently trying to build a kriging model, but I am having difficulty defining the mean term as a function dependent on space. Here is a brief description of what I can do and what I want to do. Kriging is …

---

## [Bug with noisy kriging?](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/bug-with-noisy-kriging/281)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Alexis](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/Alexis)\
**Replies:** 9\
**Last updated:** [October 10, 2023, 1:45pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/bug-with-noisy-kriging/281 "2023-10-10T13:45:51Z")

</div>

Hi, It seems that there is a bug when calibrating a kriging model with noise. It looks like the training set outputs need to be normalized to properly account for the noise. For example, if I do a kriging model on np.si…

---

## [Kriging when the MLE of the scale parameter is 0](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/kriging-when-the-mle-of-the-scale-parameter-is-0/200)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@josephmure](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/josephmure)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [April 10, 2022, 6:02am UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/kriging-when-the-mle-of-the-scale-parameter-is-0/200 "2022-04-10T06:02:45Z")

</div>

This post is an answer to a question by @BinglinW on Gitter. Question Hello everyone, in the model of Kriging, OpenTURNS can choose a variety of parameters, such as Basis and CovarianceModel, I want to know if there is…

---

## [Kriging metamodel for vector-valued models](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/kriging-metamodel-for-vector-valued-models/171)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@fabdlhm](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/fabdlhm)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [December 15, 2021, 6:03pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/kriging-metamodel-for-vector-valued-models/171 "2021-12-15T18:03:34Z")

</div>

Hello, I would like to build a Kriging metamodel of a vector-valued model (say, a map from \\mathbb{R}^d to \\mathbb{R}^n) by constructing an independent Kriging metamodel for each model component, with common experimenta…

---

## [Difference observed on trend coefficients between OPENTURNS and DiceKriging](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/difference-observed-on-trend-coefficients-between-openturns-and-dicekriging/63)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@cdurantin](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/cdurantin)\
**Replies:** 14\
**Last updated:** [November 30, 2020, 8:10am UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/difference-observed-on-trend-coefficients-between-openturns-and-dicekriging/63 "2020-11-30T08:10:22Z")

</div>

Hello My team did some training challenge on the data attached to this post. The goal is to learn the best Kriging model. We noticed a difference between the result provided by OpenTurns and by DiceKriging (R). When cov…

---

## [Covariance kernels for random processes with multidimensional output do not output symmetric matrices](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/covariance-kernels-for-random-processes-with-multidimensional-output-do-not-output-symmetric-matrices/55)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@josephmure](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/josephmure)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [November 23, 2020, 7:47pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/covariance-kernels-for-random-processes-with-multidimensional-output-do-not-output-symmetric-matrices/55 "2020-11-23T19:47:17Z")

</div>

I think there is a mistake in the way covariance kernels for random processes with multidimensional output are handled by the library. In the following code block, I do not think operator() should return a CovarianceMat…
