# Version 1.16 candidate 1 released

**URL:** <https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47>\
**Category:** Announcements\
**Created:** [October 27, 2020, 8:45am UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47 "2020-10-27T08:45:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![schueller](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openturns.discourse.group/schueller/32/3_2.png) [@schueller](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/schueller)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 8:45am UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47/1 "2020-10-27T08:45:19Z")

</div>

We are happy to announce the availability of OpenTURNS 1.16 RC1 today.

This release introduces grid graphs, hdf5 storage, a new example gallery:

> **[Examples — OpenTURNS 1.16rc1 documentation](https://openturns.github.io/openturns/latest/examples/examples.html)**

  
… and more under the hood.

For detailed informations you can have a look at the changelog:

> <https://github.com/openturns/openturns/blob/v1.16rc1/ChangeLog>

  
Or the release highlights:  

> **[Jupyter Notebook Viewer](https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/openturns/notebooks/blob/master/release_highlights_1_16.ipynb)**
>
> Check out this Jupyter notebook!

For debian users, note the debian repository moved ant that you may have to update your configuration, see the installation instructions.

This a release candidate, your feedback is important for the final release due in a few weeks,  
so dont hesitate to report bugs.

The OpenTURNS team

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dumas](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openturns.discourse.group/dumas/32/12_2.png) [@dumas](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/dumas)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 4:40pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47/2 "2020-10-27T16:40:22Z")

</div>

I just read the changelog and discover the FittingTest::Lilliefors that I did not know. I read that it is more robust that Kolmogorov when parameters’ distribution are estimated from the sample. But it seems that it is only valid when the sample is from a Normal population, is this correct ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sofianehaddad](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openturns.discourse.group/sofianehaddad/32/46_2.png) [@sofianehaddad](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/sofianehaddad)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2020, 8:49pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47/3 "2020-10-27T20:49:41Z")

</div>

Hey @schueller thanks for the release highlights notebook!  
I had it in mind and just started this but this is more complete 👌

@dumas The Lilliefors is valid for all factories. Have a look at [Lilliefors Test](https://github.com/openturns/openturns/blob/v1.16rc1/lib/src/Uncertainty/StatTests/FittingTest.cxx#L531)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![oussama-braydi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openturns.discourse.group/oussama-braydi/32/112_2.png) [@oussama-braydi](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/oussama-braydi)\
**Post date:** [February 8, 2021, 7:35pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47/4 "2021-02-08T19:35:59Z")

</div>

Hello,

I have the openturns 1.15 installed in my system, how can I get (or updated) the latest version of Openturns via anaconda, using a command line?

Thanks in advance,

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![josephmure](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openturns.discourse.group/josephmure/32/114_2.png) [@josephmure](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/josephmure)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2021, 8:47am UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47/5 "2021-02-09T08:47:21Z")

</div>

Hello @oussama-braydi. Normally the `install` command will update your package if it is already installed. Version 1.16 is the current stable version of OpenTURNS.

`conda install -c conda-forge openturns`

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![oussama-braydi](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openturns.discourse.group/oussama-braydi/32/112_2.png) [@oussama-braydi](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/oussama-braydi)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2021, 10:38am UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47/6 "2021-02-09T10:38:15Z")

</div>

Thank you @josephmure for your answer,  
However, when I try to update or install openturns in the current conda environment, many conflicts are displayed.  
The problem is fixed by creating a new conda environment and use it to install openturns 1.16 and the other needed package.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MichaelBaudin](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/openturns.discourse.group/michaelbaudin/32/9_2.png) [@MichaelBaudin](https://openturns.discourse.group/u/MichaelBaudin)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2021, 1:04pm UTC](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/version-1-16-candidate-1-released/47/7 "2021-02-09T13:04:39Z")

</div>

Hi Antoine!  
The Kolmogorov test is not more robust when parameters are estimated: Kolmogorov test is wrong when parameters are estimated from data.  
The question has already been discussed at:

> [@Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in OT](https://openturns.discourse.group/t/kolmogorov-smirnov-test-in-ot/81):
>
> hello, This might be a naive question but i was surprised to find that KS test in OT does not show a “deterministic” behavior. The resulting p-value is sometimes big enough, sometimes very close to 0, for a given sample and a given theoretical distributionFactory object. am i missing something here ? or is it just some numerical approximation thing ? thanks, sanaa

and

> <https://github.com/openturns/openturns/issues/1585>
>
> WHen using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Fitting test in the case where the distributio…n belongs to a given factory butits parameters are unknown, the returned distribution is correct (good estimated parameters), as well as the returned KS statistic.
> However, the returned P-value is bad: when running the script, the P-value seems to take random values but always with 1 digit after the comma (example sequence: 0.1 ; 0.4 ;0.2 ;0.2 ;0.3; 0...)
> 
> The example below is relative to the NormalFactory
> \[ajust\_cin\_bug\_KS.txt\](https://github.com/openturns/openturns/files/5170831/ajust\_cin\_bug\_KS.txt)

This might be interesting to know for Persalys 🙂  
Best regards,  
Michaël
